Domain |
Types of practices |
Actual Examples
( for reference; contribution sought from MSMEs) |
Government
(Ministries/
Deptt./
PSUs)
|
Public Policies Restricting Competition (share your experience) |
Industrial Policies
- A monopoly created by policy to provide a mandatory service which industries have to subscribe: Government-granted monopoly
- Such policies are introduced by different departments which unduly favour specific segment of producers at the expense of others or prevent competition in market
|
- E.g. In many states only one Pvt. Company was authorized to collect and dispose solid waste at the price determined by the company; the said company overcharged
- Zinc sulphate – a micro nutrient fertilizer, is entirely manufactured by MSEs. A nutrient based scheme is launched recently to subsidize large fertilizer producers for fortifying their fertilizers with Zinc. It has suddenly rendered large MSMEs uncompetitive.
|
|
Trade Policies (Import/ export restrictions)
- Import restriction by banning or erecting non-tariff barriers like compliance to special standards making imports expensive
- Imposition of dumping/ safeguard duties to benefit a few large domestic producers
|
- E.g. ISI standard was made mandatory for imported steel
- dumping duties on steel and plastics raw material
- Safeguard duties on aluminium sections
|
|
Govt. Purchase/ Procurement
- Unnecessary conditions may be put in tenders to restrict potential suppliers particularly to exclude MSMEs
|
- A state Govt. arbitrarily sets 25 Cr. turnover as eligibility criteria in a tender crowding out most MSMEs. Another agency, required bidders to have specific type of imported testing equipment not in vogue.
- Stipulation of past experience for arbitrarily fixed period
|
|
Public Services
- Mmonopolies continue in utilities (water, electricity etc,); Absence of competition even in commercial services like freight movement, banks, posts etc
|
- E.g. Allowing only CONCOR to move freight containers through Railways
|
|
|
Private
(Large or Small companies, Private Markets) |
Private Sector Practices Restricting Competition (share your experience) |
Cartels
- Some firms collude to fix pricing, production or adopt unfair marketing practices to limit competition
|
- Presence of cartels is frequently alleged in sectors such as steel, copper, aluminum and plastic raw material
- Price of aluminium are changed regularly by different producers by same figure
|
|
Cartels of Service providers
- Even private service providers form cartels and fleece clients through threat/ intimidation
|
- Transporters in Baddi (Himachal)and Angul (Orissa) have formed union and fixed prices having no relation with cost; do not allow companies to have their own trucks
|
|
Abuse of dominance
- Because of dominance or being a monopoly imposing unwarranted conditions on clients
|
- It is alleged that interest rates and service conditions by all banks are set in a narrow band and they act as a single large monopoly.
- Steel manufacturers have been tagging slow moving items with genuine requirement of customers
|
|
Predatory pricing:
- First pricing a product very low to kill competition. Once there is no competition the offender entity becomes a monopoly/ dominant enterprise and can increase the prices disregarding the market forces
|
- It is alleged by some telecom operators to TRAI that some companies are resorting to unjustly low price to drive out competition
- In ACSR (Conductor industry) large Cos on occasions are quoting below cost to prevent others from accessing the large customers
|
|
Collusion
- Practice of firms to co-ordinate pricing, production or marketing practices in order to limit competition
|
- Collusion is frequently alleged in Sectors e.g. steel, copper, aluminum and plastic raw material by user industries
|
|
Tied sale
- Dominant firms make you buy products that aren't naturally related but must be purchased together
|
- A PSU has had a monopoly in product ‘A’ and has other products which did not sell well. It sold items as a bucket; one had to buy two or more items even if consumer required only one item.
- An automobile company forces a showroom to sell only its own brand of cars to the exclusion of other brands.
|
|
Market dominance by Mergers & acquisitions
- Mergers and acquisitions that lead to limiting competition – this may lead to a single dominant enterprise which may abuse its dominance
|
- After acquiring the only other competitor, a large plastic raw material producing company enhanced market share ranging from 90 to 100 % in many items and jacked up prices post merger.
|
|
Other anti-competitive practices |
|
- Barriers to entry: designed to avoid the competition that new entrants would bring.
|
- Conditions of approval by certain agencies or having minimum experience are laid down preventing entry of newcomers
|
|
|
- Exclusive dealing: a firm is obliged by contract to only purchase from the contracted supplier
|
- In auto industry dealers are not allowed to do business in vehicles of competing makes
|
|
|
- Refusal to deal: two companies agree not to use a certain vendor or vice versa.
|
- Manufacturers agree not to buy raw materials from a particular supplier in order to punish him for not agreeing to their terms and conditions.
|
|
|
- Bid Rigging: a form of collusive price-fixing behaviour by which firms coordinate their bids on procurement or project contracts
|
- Participants in a bidding process decided not to bid over x amount.
|
|
|
- Price discrimination: practice of offering identical goods or service to customers in different segments of market for reasons unrelated to costs
|
- A supplier provides a particular raw material to different consumers, in the same market, at different prices.
|
|
|
- Resale Price maintenance: a situation in which the supplier forces the distributor/retail seller to sell the good to the customer at prices stipulated by the supplier.
|
- A manufacturer of product z forces the retailers to sell the product at a particular price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[The Study is being conducted, under aegis of Project ‘Strategies and Preparedness for Trade and Globalization in India’ supported by Department of Commerce (MoC&I), UNCTAD and DFID; by Federation of Indian Micro and Small & Medium Enterprises (FISME) and APJ-SLG (Law firm).]